iPhone 5 On Sale Now!

Well, it is finally here.

The iPhone 5 officially went on sale Friday, September 21, 2012. Never mind that Apple started taking "pre-orders" on Monday, September 17, and sold 2 million iPhones before they even went on sale. What is ahead? Gene Munster with the investment bank Piper Jaffray estimates that Apple will sell at least 6 million iPhones in the first weekend, but believes that "an 8 million launch weekend is achievable".

So why am I writing about iPhones in a photo blog? Because they all have cameras built in. Very good cameras.

In 2010, Canon, the number one selling digital camera manufacturer, sold 26.8 million cameras worldwide. In half that time, just the six months from October 2010 thru March 2011, Apple sold 30 million iPhones. Sales of point and shoot cameras fell 30% by value in 2011 compared with 2010. Meanwhile, the iPhone 4 became the most popular camera from which photos were uploaded to the picture-sharing site Flickr. A Pew Internet Project survey from February 2012 found that 46% of US adults owned a smart phone and the figure for 25-34 year olds is 71%.

It seems that the future of everyday, consumer photography is going to smartphones. The standard for today's smartphones seems to be the 8 megapixel resolution offered by the likes of the iPhone, Droid Razr or Samsung Galaxy, along with six shots per second and Full HD 1080p video. As of January 2012, there were more than 100 million of these “cameras” in the US and more than a billion worldwide. This goes a long way to explaining the 200 million photos uploaded to Facebook each day.

The new market segment of mirrorless compact interchangeable lens cameras (CILCs) is also growing. Compact system cameras from Nikon and Sony have 12 to 16 megapixels, with the Sony Nex-7 topping out with more than 24 megapixels.

While sales of point and shoot cameras are falling, sales of digital single lens reflex cameras (DSLRs) continue to grow, up 24% over last year, continuing a trend of double-digit increases going back to 2006. New DSLRs are arriving with 21 to 24 megapixels. The current megapixel champion is the Nikon D800, a professional DSLR offering 36 megapixels.

According to National Geographic, last year 37% of the images taken in the U.S. were captured with camera phones, and this number is expected to rise to 50% by 2015. Market researcher Infotrends expects interchangeable lens cameras, both compact and DSLR, to account for more than 50% of total US digital camera sales by 2016.

It looks as if point and shoot cameras might be going the way of Instamatics and film. In the continuing drama in Rochester, NY, Kodak, the inventor of digital photography, announced in February that they would stop making digital cameras in the first half of 2012.

What is Education?

Someone asked recently what photographers, noted for their work, were self-taught. The list is long, Daguerre, Matthew Brady, William Henry Jackson, Alfred Stieglitz, Edward Steichen, Edward Weston, Ansel Adams, Arnold Newman, Margaret Bourke-White, Ilse Bing, Philippe Halsman, Irving Penn and the list goes on and on.

Then I wondered, "Do I count?" I got my first camera, a Kodak Brownie Hawkeye, when I was five. No one "taught" me photography but I grew up in a household where a new Life and Look magazine arrived weekly and National Geographic came every month. I was always trying to figure out how they got those photos. It did not occur to me for years that they weren't using Brownies as well. As I got older, I studied Ansel Adams' books and Minor White's book on the Zone System and Aaron Sussman's "The Amateur Photographer's Handbook. Then I knew that those photographers were not using Brownies and I began saving to buy a Nikon. Although I was photo editor and a photographer for my college yearbook, I majored in economics. Now, without the formal training or degree in photography, art, fine art, etc., I am teaching photography at a local college.

Personally, I don't think of myself as "self-taught", but maybe self-educated. I learned photography from the great photographers of Look, Life, and National Geographic. I was "taught" by masters of photography, Steichen, Stieglitz, Adams, Minor White, Margaret Bourke-White, and master photography educator Aaron Sussman and the chemists and engineers at Kodak. What do you think; do I count as "self-taught"? Or, are we all indebted to those photographers that we have had contact with that came before us, regardless of our "education"

Kodak and Digital Photography circa 1994

The The recent press coverage and various discussions about Kodak’s bankruptcy filing last month caused me to start thinking about the major role Kodak has played in my photographic life. From my first camera, a Kodak Brownie Hawkeye, through Kodachrome, Ektachrome and Tri-X PAN to the APS-C format sensor in my Nikon D7000s, Kodak has always been a major presence. The comments that Kodak invented digital still photography made me think specifically about my early days with digital photography.



My experience with digital photography began in 1994 with the Kodak Photo CD. Photo CD was a system of digitizing and storing up to 100 photos in a proprietary format at 5 different resolutions up to 6.3 megapixels. Photo CD Pro Master discs had 25 photos in 6 resolutions up to 25 megapixels. At the time, for Photo CD, I was shooting Kodak Royal Gold at ASA 100 and 400 with Nikon F3s and prime NIKKOR lenses. I would have my film processed by Kodak and would receive negatives, prints and a Photo CD with the photos for about $1 a frame. This was a big deal in 1994; digital photography in 1994 was expensive. The alternatives were more expensive drum scans of negatives and transparencies or the Kodak DCS 460. The DCS 460 was a Kodak digital back mated to a Nikon N90s body; it had 6 megapixels and retailed for $28,500 (about $43,500 in today’s dollars).

Kodak DCS 460

The Photo CD route to digital photography had its own costs too. Processing digital photos in Photoshop required very robust hardware. I used a custom built Windows based PC spec’d as follows:

·   Processor/BIOS/Bus:             

o   AMD 386DX-40 - this was actually faster than an Intel 486DX-33

o   AMD 80387DX Coprocessor

o   AMI Bios

o   EISA Bus

·   Memory

o   32 MB – 4 MB SIMMS in 8 Slots

·   SCSI Drive System

o   Adaptec AHA-1742A EISA SCSI-2 Card in Enhanced Mode

o   250 MB HDD - System Partition

o   1 GB Toshiba HDD - Applications, Fonts, etc.

o   1 GB Toshiba HDD - Data

o   SyQuest SQ3270 - 270 MB

o   Iomega Zip Drive - 100 MB

o   NEC CD-ROM

o   HP ScanJet IIC

o   2 Sony 1.44 Floppy Drives

·   Video

o   Diamond Stealth PRO Video Card with 4 MB RAM

o   NEC 21 in. flat/square monitor, .28 dot pitch , 75 Hz refresh rate

The operating system was Windows for Workgroups 3.11 over MS-DOS 6.22. My applications were Aldus PageMaker 4.0, Adobe Photoshop 3.0, Adobe Illustrator 4.0, CorelDraw 3.0, Adobe Type Manager for Windows 2.0, Microsoft Excel for Windows 4.0 and Microsoft Word for Windows 2.0.

Workflow with Photo CD images was to open the Base image, 512 x 768 pixels or about a 1.2 MB file, turn on a macro recorder and then start editing the base image. The macro recorder captured mouse clicks and keystrokes, saving them for later. At the end of the day, you would close all your applications and restart your computer, ensuring a clean machine with fully available resources. Then you would launch Photoshop, open the 16 Base image, 2048 x 3072 pixels or an 18 MB file, launch the macro and go home for the night. If all went well, you had an edited 16 base image in the morning. With a resolution of 96 dpi, the 16 Base image had what Kodak described as a “poster” size of 32 x 21 inches. At 300 dpi this yielded an image approximately 6 ¾ x 10 ¼ inches.

Another cost of digital photography in those early years was time. Since final image editing was automated and occurred overnight, this didn’t really count. The major time investment in those days was waiting for screen redraws. Forget about “previews” as we think of them today. Even with a fast processor, coprocessor and lots of memory, video was the big bottleneck. Even with video acceleration, it took seemingly forever for the image to redraw on the screen. The only solution to this was the fastest video card you could afford with as much video memory as possible.

One final word about memory; it is true today that Windows loves memory, it was even more so in 1994. By contemporary standards, the 32 MB of RAM that I had was outrageous. This amount of memory contributed to my system being fast and stable; I did not experience the “Blue Screen of Death” that so many complained about. Having 32 MB of RAM installed allowed me to run Photoshop and PageMaker at the same time and still have a print job running in the background. It was an unusual, but necessary, luxury to be afforded so much memory. By comparison, today I am running an Intel Core i7-3960X with 32 GB of RAM installed for which I paid considerably less than that 386-DX40 from 1994. Thank-you Gordon Moore.

Tags: Kodak, Kodak Photo CD, Kodak DCS 460, Kodak History, Kodak Brownie Hawkeye, Kodak 1990-1999, Kodak bankruptcy, Steven J. Sasson, APS-C, Nikon D7000, Windows for Workgroups 3.11

Steven L. Sasson inventor of the
world's first digital still camera,
.01 megapixels.